News

Dallas-based Energy Transfer is suing Greenpeace for $300 million. It became clear through expert witness testimony from ...
Jury finds Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions over pipeline protests 02:42. In a win for the oil and gas pipeline company Energy Transfer, a nine-person North Dakota jury found the ...
Energy Transfer accuses three Greenpeace entities — Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International and Greenpeace Fund — of ...
Greenpeace argues that Energy Transfer is being disingenuous about the purpose of the lawsuit, which the company denies. "This case is simple.
Following a dawn ceremony on the 10 July 2025 in Auckland, the Rainbow Warrior will be open to the public for tours and talks ...
Environment campaign group Greenpeace filed a lawsuit against US energy company Energy Transfer in Amsterdam on Wednesday, ...
TRESPASS TO LAND Did Defendants trespass on Energy Transfer's land? 1. Greenpeace Inc. Greenpeace Fund Greenpeace International Х YES NO YES Х NO X YES NO If you answered YES as to any of the ...
In March, a North Dakota jury found against Greenpeace in a highly watched trial, ordering the environmental group to pay pipeline company Energy Transfer more than $660 million in damages. The case ...
The European Union's new anti-SLAPP law is being put to the test as Greenpeace International, headquartered in Amsterdam, ...
Greenpeace USA was found at fault for most of the claims brought by Energy Transfer. The jury did not find Greenpeace International and Greenpeace Fund responsible for on-the-ground harms ...
Attorneys for Greenpeace International, Greenpeace Fund and BankTrack filed motions on Tuesday to dismiss a lawsuit filed in August by Energy Transfer Partners in U.S. District Court in North Dakota.
Much of Energy Transfer’s allegations stem from Greenpeace’s ties to the Red Warrior Society, a Native American resistance group that led multiple attacks and demonstrations on pipeline ...