A North Dakota jury has begun deliberating on whether Greenpeace defamed a pipeline company and disrupted its controversial ...

Energy Transfer has taken Greenpeace to trial over claims that the environmental group incited illegal acts by protesters in North Dakota that cost the company millions of dollars in alleged property ...

Greenpeace criticizes the lawsuit as an example of corporations abusing the legal system to go after critics. A spokesperson ...

Nick Tilsen’s deposition was the latest testimony heard by the nine-person jury in the marathon trial between pipeline ...

Energy Transfer claims Greenpeace aided and abetted criminal behavior by protesters during demonstrations against the ...

MANDAN, N.D. — A North Dakota jury began deliberating Monday on whether Greenpeace defamed a pipeline company and disrupted its controversial Dakota Access Pipeline project using what the ...

The owners of the Dakota Access Pipeline allege Greenpeace masterminded the raucous protests in 2016 and 2017 against the ...

A former Greenpeace employee who trained demonstrators during the Dakota Access Pipeline protests told jurors Tuesday that he ...

FILE - In this Thursday Dec. 1, 2016 file photo, the Oceti Sakowin camp where people have gathered to protest the Dakota Access oil pipeline stands in the background as a children sled down a hill ...

The pipeline was completed in 2017. Energy Transfer and its subsidiary Dakota Access allege trespass, nuisance, defamation ...

The $300 million trial between Dakota Access Pipeline developer and Greenpeace reached the halfway mark on Monday as the ...