Jury finds Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions over pipeline protests 02:42. In a win for the oil and gas pipeline company Energy Transfer, a nine-person North Dakota jury found the ...

Dallas-based Energy Transfer is suing Greenpeace for $300 million. It became clear through expert witness testimony from ...

Energy Transfer accuses three Greenpeace entities — Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International and Greenpeace Fund — of ...

In 2019, Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace in North Dakota state court for its role in inflaming the protests, accusing the organization of funding attacks to damage the pipeline and spreading ...

Greenpeace argues that Energy Transfer is being disingenuous about the purpose of the lawsuit, which the company denies. "This case is simple.

Environment campaign group Greenpeace filed a lawsuit against US energy company Energy Transfer in Amsterdam on Wednesday, ...

TRESPASS TO LAND Did Defendants trespass on Energy Transfer's land? 1. Greenpeace Inc. Greenpeace Fund Greenpeace International Х YES NO YES Х NO X YES NO If you answered YES as to any of the ...

Following a dawn ceremony on the 10 July 2025 in Auckland, the Rainbow Warrior will be open to the public for tours and talks ...

In March, a North Dakota jury found against Greenpeace in a highly watched trial, ordering the environmental group to pay pipeline company Energy Transfer more than $660 million in damages. The case ...

Greenpeace USA was found at fault for most of the claims brought by Energy Transfer. The jury did not find Greenpeace International and Greenpeace Fund responsible for on-the-ground harms ...

Much of Energy Transfer’s allegations stem from Greenpeace’s ties to the Red Warrior Society, a Native American resistance group that led multiple attacks and demonstrations on pipeline ...

Energy Transfer also alleges that through defamation, Greenpeace pressured nearly half of the pipeline’s investors to withdraw or reduce their support for the project.