Of the editors banned from the topic area by the Arbitration Committee, often referred to as Wikipedia’s “supreme court,” six are from the pro-Palestinian camp and two from the pro-Israel camp.

Editors pulled a standalone page on Iran’s policy to destroy Israel, instead ... 'Recurring Trend': Wikipedia Demoting Pro-Israel Content. Aaron Bandler, JNS.org June 24, 2025.

DHS said at a trial Wednesday that it used a list from the site, which has been accused of doxxing people whom it sees as ...

Dozens of editors worked together to flood Wikipedia with “antisemitic narratives, anti-Israel bias, and misleading information,” the ADL’s Center for Tech and Society said.

At least 30 Wikipedia editors are acting together in a coordinated campaign to fill the collaborative online encyclopedia with widespread antisemitic and anti-Israel bias, in likely violation of ...

The Anti-Defamation League has found evidence of antisemitic and anti-Israel bias on Wikipedia, it said in a Tuesday report, marking the latest rift between the advocacy group and the world’s ...

Group includes two pro-Israel editors. UPDATE: Wikipedia’s Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) closed the case on Jan. 23; the topic bans and the balanced editing restriction are official. As part of ...

In the past 12 months, the bad-faith editors made 19,605 edits, while the Israel-Hamas editors made 16,063, the China-US editors 815, and the Pro Editors only 42 (the 30 Pro Editors group is taken ...

But pro-Israel advocates have elevated their complaints in recent months into journalistic exposes and watchdog activism ...

More than two dozen Wikipedia editors allegedly colluded in a years-long scheme to inject anti-Israel language on topics ...

Of the editors banned from the topic area by the Arbitration Committee, often referred to as Wikipedia’s “supreme court,” six are from the pro-Palestinian camp and two from the pro-Israel camp.

But pro-Israel advocates have elevated their complaints in recent months into journalistic exposes and watchdog activism meant to expose what they say is a cynical exploitation of Wikipedia’s ...