The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit ...

According to 404 Media, Wikipedia announced the opt-in AI pilot on June 2, which was set to run for two weeks on the mobile version of the site. The summaries appeared at the top of select articles in ...

An experiment adding AI-generated summaries to the top of Wikipedia pages has been paused, following fierce backlash from its community editors. The Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit behind ...

Wikipedia has halted its trial rollout of AI summaries for some of its articles after a very strong rebuke from its extensive network of human editors. Claiming that such a move would "do ...

Wikipedia's plan to roll out AI summaries wasn’t the only thing editors had gripes about, though. Wikipedia has in some ways become a byword for sober boringness, which is excellent.

Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

More websites, including Wikipedia and academic archives, are grousing about AI freeloaders that siphon their information.

Editors almost immediately criticized the pilot, raising concerns that it could damage Wikipedia's credibility.

An experiment adding AI-generated summaries to the top of Wikipedia pages has been paused, following fierce backlash from its community editors. The Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit behind ...

Wikipedia is literally Generative Human Intelligence. There's no unqiue research, thoughts, or conclusions in there. It's a human-generated response to a request for information that uses other ...

Inside Wikipedia’s AI revolt—and what it means for the media. Pete Pachal . Tue, Jul 1, 2025, 4:00 AM 5 min read.